Quantcast
Channel: Debian User Forums
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3567

Testing And Unstable • [SID - Unstable] Kernel 6.10.x - long boot time?

$
0
0
Upgraded ZFS to 2.2.6. Even with 6.8.12 booting slower than previously 6.10.9 is still slower.

Code:

root@p1g4:~# systemd-analyze Startup finished in 19.970s (kernel) + 34.288s (userspace) = 54.258s graphical.target reached after 34.148s in userspace.root@p1g4:~# uname -r6.10.9-amd64

Code:

root@p1g4:~# systemd-analyze Startup finished in 10.531s (kernel) + 16.097s (userspace) = 26.628s graphical.target reached after 16.097s in userspace.root@p1g4:~# uname -r6.8.12-amd64
I found the following kernel 6.9.9 packages in the apt cache folder:

Code:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   1845896 Jul 13 22:55 linux-headers-6.9.9-amd64_6.9.9-1_amd64.deb-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  10462716 Jul 13 15:41 linux-headers-6.9.9-common_6.9.9-1_all.deb-rw-r--r-- 1 root root      1392 Jul 14 05:30 linux-headers-amd64_6.9.9-1_amd64.deb-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 100440400 Jul 14 05:30 linux-image-6.9.9-amd64_6.9.9-1_amd64.deb-rw-r--r-- 1 root root      1452 Jul 14 05:30 linux-image-amd64_6.9.9-1_amd64.deb-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   1102440 Jul 13 22:55 linux-kbuild-6.9.9_6.9.9-1_amd64.deb-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2347528 Jul 13 15:41 linux-libc-dev_6.9.9-1_all.deb
Is there any reason why I shouldn't install these to check the performance? I can probably skip libc-dev package, but I need all other 4, correct?

Statistics: Posted by maloosheck — 2024-09-12 00:23 — Replies 14 — Views 2003



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3567

Trending Articles